The
exploration of the neurobiological bases of the cognitive processes that
underlie the decision-making (DM) have been recently the object of many studies
in neurophysiology and computational neuroscience. By tracing the neuronal
circuits that are involved in the DM it is possible to get biophysically
reliable models linking the dynamics of the neuronal activities to decisional
behavior. The present section recalls
the major findings regarding this issue. Firstly, it is focused the role of the
basal ganglia and the related model of reinforcement learning is described.
Afterward, the neuronal circuits involving the dynamics of the lateral
intraparietal area (LIP) and the superior colliculus (SC) are considered. They
provide the theoretical bases for the development and implementation of the models of DM that are set up as a
two-fold circuitry of valuation and choice, by which the accumulation and the
processing of information (evidence) take place. A mathematical reasoning have
been argued here to assess that both the phases of valuation and choice are
exposed to the noise effects. This lays the foundations for the Bayesian brain conception (noisy-information-and-bayesian-brain.html).
It is known that DM is a process that involves different areas of the brain.
These regions include the cortical areas that are supposed to integrate
evidence supporting alternative actions, and the basal ganglia (BG), that are
hypothesized to act as a central switch
in gating behavioral requests [1-7]. In natural environments several sensory stimuli
produce different alternatives and hence demand the evaluation of different
possible responses, i.e. a variety of behaviors. In other terms, it arises also
a selection question [4] by which the (probability) distribution of the
correct response has to take control of the individual’s motor plant [8]. The action
selection then would resolve a conflict among decisional centers throughout the
brain. A central switch that considers the urgency and opportunity of specific
response to the stimuli result an optimal solution in computational terms and
physiologically reliable by taking the BG as the neural base for that switch.
Accordingly, BG gather input from all over the brain and, by sending tonic
inhibition to midbrain and brain stem targets involved in motor actions, block
the cortical control over these actions [1,2,9].
Therefore, the inhibition of the neurons in the output nuclei, caused by BG
activity, determines the disinhibition of their targets and the actions would
be consequently selected.
This model, ultimately explains that in the DM among alternative options, the
cortical areas associated with the alternatives integrate their corresponding
evidence, whilst the BG by acting as a central switch evaluates the evidence
and facilitates the best supported responses (behaviors) [8].
Many studies have also reported a significant increase
in the firing rate of the neurons of cortical areas representing the
alternative choices during DM in visual tasks. The increase of the firing rates then would provide accumulation of
evidence (i.e., information) related to the alternatives [5,6]. Reliable models of DM based on the
neurophysiology, consider connections from neurons representing stimuli to the
appropriate cortical neurons representing decisions (e.g., motor actions). This
functional relationship provides the stimulus-to-response mapping [6,10].
- Chevalier, G., Vacher, S., Deniau, J. M., Desban, M. (1985). Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal
functions. I. The striato-nigral influence on
tectospinal/tecto-diencephalic neurons. Brain Res, 334(2), 215-226.
- Deniau, J. M., Chevalier, G. (1985). Disinhibition
as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. II. The
striato-nigral influence on thalamocortical cells of the ventromedial
thalamic nucleus. Brain Res, 334(2),
227-233.
- Medina,
L., Reiner, A. (1995). Neurotransmitter organization and connectivity of
the basal ganglia in vertebrates: implications for the evolution of basal
ganglia. Brain Behav Evol, 46(4-5), 235-258.
- Redgrave, P., Prescott,
T. J., Gurney, K. (1999). The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the
selection problem? Neurosci 89(4),
1009-1023.
- Schall, J. D. (2001). Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2(1), 33-42.
- Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. (2001). Neural basis of a perceptual
decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol, 86(4), 1916-1936.
- Smith, Y., Bevan, M. D., Shink, E., Bolam, J. P. (1998).
Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. Neurosci, 86(2), 353-387.
- Bogacz, R.,
Gurney, K. (2007). The basal ganglia and
cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Comput 19(2):442-477.
- Parent, A., Hazrati, L. N. (1995). Functional anatomy of the basal
ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia thalamocortical loop. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 20(1), 91-127.
- Wang, X. J. (2002). Probabilistic decision making by slow
reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron, 36(5), 955-968.
Comments
Post a Comment